>
Really, I cannot understand. People attacks dispensationalism, dispensational salvations and especially the dispensational interpretation of the book of Revelation, making association with some things that a cardinal Jesuit affirmed about that.
BUT... at the same time, the same crowd doesn't tell anything about the "modern versions of the bible", which are based on a preconceived hatred towards the King James Bible, and are using CATHOLIC manuscripts and texts....
Strange the world, isn't it? It seems rather that the attack against the "Jesuitical futurism" works as a distraction, taking your attention away from the fact that when you study your bible, you are studying from a CATHOLIC bible, no matter how much you imagine to find in it "fundamentalist", "protestant", "baptist" even "anti-Catholic" doctrines.
If you study from an ESV, NIV, RSV, NRS, etcetera, you are studying from bibles whose text is a Catholic text. The Jesuits' plan of taking back the "protestant" flock is very simple, let the heretic study from our bible.
Below two video in which David Daniels and Christian Pinto are discussing how the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, the two "oldest bibles in the world!", believed to be written in the fourth century, are two fake bibles, one created in the 19° century, the other in the 15° century:
Above video - CHRIS PINTO and DAVID DANIELS (Chick Publications) on Codex Sinaiticus
URL: https://youtu.be/GZhNHIuwh9g
Above video - David Daniels Interview Part Two -- Is Codex Vaticanus a Forgery?
URL: https://youtu.be/hC0czphwhZs
* * *
