Calvi-nuts 7 --- the Calvinist hallucinations on "world" and "whole"

 >

A commentary on the Alien Abduction like experience of a Calvinist mind:

https://jesus-partisans-on-the-balkans.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-ethnic-meaning-of-world-in-john-3.html

Christo Stylianov author of Jesus Partisan on Balkans accused the word of God to be deceptive:

 Free willists can't provide a good reason as to why ALL MEN or simply ALL shouldn't be taken in an absolute sense ("without exception") in any of the following verses. 

This is the fantasy of a Calvi-nuts. Calvinism is taking things absolutely therfore everywhere there's an "all" like 1 John 3:9 or "whole" as in John 3:16 they are never in absolute sense:

16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

17For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

 

You have not to love the WORLD:

15Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

16For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

 

ALL that is in the world ...... is NOT of the Father....

"Oh but this 'all' is not in absolute sense!" - replies the calvinist. It seems that God is not of the same sick opinion, as He told before to "love not THE world".

So the Calvinist devil, in order to "make up" his demented idea of predestinationism, wants you to believe that "world" is not the world, but some subsets of the world. A person is not a person, but a part of his body ?  ? ?

 "He would start by taking out some jews out of their generation, as Peter preached in Jerusalem. And he would finish with taking some out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; (Rev 5:9)."

Only a deficient would say that as few dead walking men in the death row were saved from the electric chair by the governor's grace, ALL prisoner sentenced to death were saved. But Calvinism teaches this about God, the Calvinist God is a deficient ("nothing is impossible with God").  

WORLD:

1

a

: the earthly state of human existence

b

: life after death —used with a qualifier

the next world

2

: the earth with its inhabitants and all things upon it

3

: individual course of life : career

4

: the inhabitants of the earth : the human race

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/world

 

And I left all the following definitions which only confirm the above ones.

The "world" is always and ENTIRETY, a WHOLE. A part of the world is NOT the world. When Jesus said that he came to save the WORLD he meant the WORLD, not few parts of it.

Therefore if sometime a dead walking man in a death row is pardoned and is not executed, the governor didn't save the WORLD (aka the WHOLE community) of dead walking men in his state prison, the governor saved just one, or few,  A PART OF THE WHOLE community (the "world of dead walking men").

The Calvi-dishonests know well that "world" and "whole" can be synonimous.

If that governor would say that he saved the WHOLE community (or the "world") of dead walking men in the state prison, because he saved only ONE (or just only few of them), that governor should be at least impeached because affected by a serious mental disturbance and unable to carry on his duty as representative of the  people's will.

(We could suggest him to become a .... Calvinist preacher specialized in .....predestinationism 🤣)

Calvinist and predestinationist dishonest guys are exactly brainwashing you in to believe that God is an idiot jerk like that governor, becase "nothing is impossible with God" and "the foolishness of God is above the wisdom of man" blah blah blah. 

Therefore any idiocy and psychosis of a Predestinationist Mind can be attributed to God thanks those verses.

Isn't smart the Devil, making you blaspheme God while you believe to praise Him ? But just for this purpose the Devil created - among many of his wonders - Calvinism with its predestinationist spiritual syphilis.

The weight of the proof is on them, as they claim that these words must be used the same way throughout Scripture. Evidently, they are not. They are used differently in different contexts and, in fact, the absolute meaning is VERY rarely used. There are a whole lot of these non absolute verses. I have only presented two.

"There are a WHOLE lot of these non absolute verses. I have only presented two." 😂😂😂 

 

And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

Evidently the Eskimos, the Indians, the Japanese and many others, together with the rejectors, as well as all people who died without hearing these tidings, are EXCLUDED.

Therefore God predestinated some to be saved the most to be damned just only because He isn't able to bring the Gospel to the Inuit in the age of emperor Nero ? But God is not unfair like the Calvinist God, he provided EVERYONE a means of salvation and he shut the mouth of the predestinationist with:

12For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;

13(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.

14For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:

15Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

16In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.

 

This is for all the people who never heard the Gospel. Do you think God is so stupid just in order to fit the Calvinist nut-dreams ?

"EXCLUDED": And then, why not ?  Isn't God a predestinationist ? [by hypothesis] .... If He has decided the majority of the world population is lost without hope, why to send to them the Gospel ?  

See  now the demency of this argument ?  

Or contrary - wise: why need of the Gospel if they are already saved ? 

But no one can deliver the Gospel to infant babies or foetuses. The tidings must go to adult or well aware people, in order they can hear and chose. "No! .... they have already been chosen!".... Why then they need of the Gospel ?  ..... Babies, and unborn babies ?  They don't need of the Gospel. WHY SHOULD AN ADULT OR GROWN SOUL HEAR THE GOSPEL ?

14How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

If God saves unborn babies without delivering them the Gospel, why the adults are not saved without the Gospel ? Isn't nothing impossible with God?

Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of all men:

According to the free willers, the Eskimos, the Indians, the Japanese and many others were spectators of Paul's ministry. But it is evidently false.

Now, the husband of Mrs Dishonesty is Mr Calvinism. The men here all the ones interacting with the Corinth's church because this is the CONTEXT. But which is the context of  1 Peter 3:9 ?

9The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

They are called GENERAL epistles for a reason, aren't they ? 

Is that "all" referring to "us-ward" ? Don't tell me that the  brethren of Peter were still needing to be .....saved. In this case they were NOT brethren, but still gentile, lost souls.

Therefore "Us-Ward" is referring to the generality of lost souls needing to be saved. Peter and his bunch DIDN'T need to be saved. Here Pete & C. simply impersonate the generality of the whole lost mankind, putting themselves in it with a mental time travel when they were still unsaved lost souls. They lower themselves to the same plane of lost souls. This is called HUMILITY,  an unknown word in the Predestinationist's dictionary.

Then there's that "longsuffering". Even more idiotic the predestinationist interpretation. God is NOT longsuffering towards the ones he has already condemned or saved. Longsuffering or "to suffer for a long time", therefore there's a moment when the suffering will cease. But if one is already saved before to be created, there's no need for God to suffer. But if there's a free will independent from God's, there God needs longsuffering. 

If with God nothing is impossible, is the same God who eternally and infallibly decreed that man has independent free-will.

MORE TO COME ON THE IDIOCY OF CALVI-NUTTISM.

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Calvinuts 6 - Predestinationism is the Devil fight against rationality

https://spirithismouth.blogspot.com/2025/06/calvinuts-6-predestinationism-is-devil.html

Calvinuts 6 - Predestinationism is the Devil fight against rationality

>

".....In conclusion, this Bible verse does not say what the Calvinist wants it to say. It in no way indicates that Jesus wants anyone less than the whole world to be saved, only that He isn’t praying for the whole world at that particular moment. Moreover, not only is He not praying for the whole world at that moment (in John 17:9), He’s not even praying for the “world of the elect” either. Not until verse 20 does Jesus even pray for all who would eventually believe.....".

*   *   *

Calvinuttism is so stupid that it doesn't need of a dispensational, Ruckmanite, KJV-Only source to flush it down the toilet.

It's called "common sense". Therefore to fight common sense, rationality, to replace it with insanity and mental illness, the Devil wants to make you believe that God decided what is an healthy mind and what is not, before the creation of the world. As  Predestinationists use tons of common sense and rationality, they are hypocrite. When a verse contradict their lunatic phantasies they distort against logic the interpretation ("don't question God's will!"). Of course to come back on the tracks of common sense to defend their absurdities in a "rationale fashion". Therefore they have to hide their hypocrisy behind an eternal decree which states that they are not hypocrites, but "elected". In other words, they are filthy sinner showing themselves 'saints':

https://cerebralfaith.net/if-jesus-wants-everyone-saved-why-did/

[you can check the verses with the ones from the AV 1611 to see that the fundamental concepts are still held by the perverted Alexandrian bible used by the author of the quoted post]

*   *   *

If Jesus Wants Everyone Saved, Why Did He Not Pray For The World?

Post author:Evan Minton

Post published:April 11, 2015

Post category:Calvinist Proof Texts / God's Love / The Extent Of The Atonement

Post comments:0 Comments

Reading time:6 mins read

One very common Calvinist proof text for limited atonement and a limited salvic will on God’s part is in John 17:9. The context of the passage is Jesus in Garden Of Gethsemane. The synoptic gospels do record some of the content of Jesus’ preaching, but the Apostle John chooses to reveal a lot more content than simply “If it be Your will, let this cup pass from me”. From John’s gospel, we know that Jesus’ prayer was a whole lot longer than what the synoptic gospels tell us. Well, in verse 9 of John 17, Jesus says “I pray for them. I am not praying for the world, but for those you have given me, for they are yours.” In other words, the Calvinist interprets this as Jesus saying that He’s not praying for the salvation of the world, but only for the salvation of those who were predestined (i.e “those you have given me”). But does this mean that Jesus doesn’t really want everyone saved? Is that why He’s not praying for them?

Before I give my exegesis of this passage, there’s something we need to keep in mind.

The Bible Says God Wants The Whole World Saved In Several Other Passages

John 3:16-18 (the most well known passage in the New Testament) states “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son. Whosoever believes in Him will not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send His son into the world to condemn the world but that the world might be saved through Him. Everyone who believes in Him will not perish but whoever does not believe is condemned already because he has not believed in the only son of God.” A casual reading of this passage indicates that God loves everyone. Why? Because it says He loves the world. Is Hitler part of the world? Am I part of the world? Are you part of the world? Was Judas Iscariot part of the world? Was Caiphas part of the world? This passage seems to be using the word “World” because Jesus wanted Nicodemus (the person he was speaking to in this chapter) to know that God The Father was giving Him up for every single human being, i.e anyone who is part of the world. He loves everyone who is a part of the world, such that He gave up His only son to die for them.

But then you have 1 Timothy 2:4-6 which affirms not only God’s salvic will, but also whom Christ died for. “This is good and pleases God our savior who wants all people to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people. “

2 Peter 3:9 likewise affirms that God “…is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.”

1 John 2:2, says “[Jesus] is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”

You also have Hebrews 2:9 which says that Jesus “tasted death for everyone.”

There are several other passages that teach us that the number of people God wants to save is every single person who walks the face of the Earth. I get into a lot more of them in my blog post “Is Molinism Biblical”. Anyway, since scripture teaches that God loves everyone, wants everyone to be saved, and that Jesus died on the cross for everyone, whatever Jesus means here in his Gethsemane prayer, it’s probably not that He doesn’t want the whole world saved.

We should always interpret the unclear passages of scripture in light of the clear passages. The Bible says over and over and over and over that God wants “all people” to be saved (2 Peter 3:9, 1 Timothy 2:4) that’s why Jesus died for “the world” (John 3:16), the “whole world” (1 John 2:2), for “everyone” (Hebrews 2:9, 1 Timothy 2:6). And this explains why He grieves when He has to send anyone to Hell for their sins (see Ezekiel 18:23, Ezekiel 18:33, Luke 19:41-44). In light of these clear passages of scripture, however we interpret John 17:9, we should do it in light of these above quoted scriptures. Interpret the unclear passages in light of the clear.

What Did Jesus Actually Mean in John 17:9?

Well, it seems to me that the Calvinist is reading a limited salvic will of God into the scripture. There doesn’t appear to be anything about the verse that indicates Jesus doesn’t want the whole world saved? Jesus is speaking in the present tense. Jesus says “I am not praying for the world, but for those you have given me, for they are yours.” Jesus said “I am not praying for them.” Jesus doesn’t say “I have not” or “I will not” or “I have never and will never” pray for the world. He’s saying “I am not” praying for the world.

In other words, “I am not currently praying for the world. I’ll save that for a later date. Rather, right now, I’m praying for my disciples, and the ones whom you’ve given me.” It is the case that Jesus is not praying for the world in that particular instance. It would be like if I said a prayer today and prayed “Lord, I am not praying for all unbelievers, but only those who are closest to me. I care about them and want to spend eternity with them. Please bring them into a loving relationship with Yourself somehow.” Now, that doesn’t mean I’ve never prayed for unbelievers whom I’m not close to (like Dawkins for example). It just that I wasn’t praying for them in that particular moment. It seems to me that this is what we have with Jesus in John 17. Jesus isn’t praying for the salvation of the world in that particular moment. Jesus is simply praying for the elect.

Perhaps Jesus prayed for the non-elect on occasions prior to this which we don’t even know about, which the gospel writers didn’t record. The gospels do only record Jesus’ birth, an incident that happened when He was 12, and His 3 year ministry. It doesn’t record all of the prayers that Jesus ever prayed. Maybe He did pray for the entire human race on unrecorded occasions. Given that God wants all people to be saved (2 Peter 3:9, 1 Timothy 2:4), it would certainly make sense if He did.

Moreover, Jesus isn’t even praying for all believers, only the 12 disciples. This is evident from the fact that Jesus says in John 17:20, “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message” So Jesus isn’t even praying for all believers until several verses later.

In conclusion, this Bible verse does not say what the Calvinist wants it to say. It in no way indicates that Jesus wants anyone less than the whole world to be saved, only that He isn’t praying for the whole world at that particular moment. Moreover, not only is He not praying for the whole world at that moment (in John 17:9), He’s not even praying for the “world of the elect” either. Not until verse 20 does Jesus even pray for all who would eventually believe.

Calvi-nuts 3 ...abusers and rapers of Titus 3

 >

Dr. Ruckman's commentary Pastoral Epistles, Titus 3:

QUOTE: “But after that the KINDNESS AND LOVE OF GOD.” 

Note how God’s attitude is contrasted with man’s.

With man it was “malice,” “hateful,” and “hating one another,” and

with God it is “kindness” and “love.” God is kind to the unthankful and unholy

(Luke 6:35), and His love was for the “ungodly” (Rom. 5:6)

and “sinners” (Rom. 5:8). “God our Saviour” (vs. 4)—plainly

interpreting 2:13, where no one could miss it

but the translators of the “new” bibles.

The “God” and “Saviour” of 2:13 is the same one.

Exactly why anyone should think it was TWO is unexplainable in the

light of Isaiah 19:20, where the King James English clearly shows

the “hendiady” that is part of Hebrew and Greek speech. 

Observe: “And he shall send them a SAVIOUR, and a GREAT ONE,

and HE shall deliver them.” Notice how the infallible English with the inerrant

English clears up all of the confused nonsense produced by the “original Greek”

and the “original Hebrew.” In Genesis 49:7, Jacob says, “Cursed be their

ANGER, for it was fierce; AND their WRATH, for it was cruel.” In this

passage WRATH is an amplification of ANGER, as anyone (but a modern

reviser) can see. The thing is so common in Proverbs (1:26, 31; 2:4, 12, 21, 22)

as to be absolutely ridiculous when trying to alter Titus 2:13. Leave it as it stands

in the AV.

“Love of God our Saviour toward MAN appeared” (vs. 4), not the ELECT. 

The word “man” here is a reference to God’s love and kindness to mankind, 

not the “elect,” as Calvin, Pink, Tolley, Shelton, 

and other hardshells would have it. 

“Man” is certainly not a reference to the Body of

Christ. [END OF QUOTE]

OBSERVATION: notice on how Calvi-diocy conflates with Catho-arrogance. Catholicism wants all men to be 'brethren' - and Calvinism reads 'men' as 'predestinated ones'. Just marry both and you have the LGBTQ wedding of two abusers of the body of Christ.