Calvi-nuts 7 --- the Calvinist hallucinations on "world" and "whole"

 >

A commentary on the Alien Abduction like experience of a Calvinist mind:

https://jesus-partisans-on-the-balkans.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-ethnic-meaning-of-world-in-john-3.html

Christo Stylianov author of Jesus Partisan on Balkans accused the word of God to be deceptive:

 Free willists can't provide a good reason as to why ALL MEN or simply ALL shouldn't be taken in an absolute sense ("without exception") in any of the following verses. 

This is the fantasy of a Calvi-nuts. Calvinism is taking things absolutely therfore everywhere there's an "all" like 1 John 3:9 or "whole" as in John 3:16 they are never in absolute sense:

16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

17For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

 

You have not to love the WORLD:

15Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

16For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

 

ALL that is in the world ...... is NOT of the Father....

"Oh but this 'all' is not in absolute sense!" - replies the calvinist. It seems that God is not of the same sick opinion, as He told before to "love not THE world".

So the Calvinist devil, in order to "make up" his demented idea of predestinationism, wants you to believe that "world" is not the world, but some subsets of the world. A person is not a person, but a part of his body ?  ? ?

 "He would start by taking out some jews out of their generation, as Peter preached in Jerusalem. And he would finish with taking some out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; (Rev 5:9)."

Only a deficient would say that as few dead walking men in the death row were saved from the electric chair by the governor's grace, ALL prisoner sentenced to death were saved. But Calvinism teaches this about God, the Calvinist God is a deficient ("nothing is impossible with God").  

WORLD:

1

a

: the earthly state of human existence

b

: life after death —used with a qualifier

the next world

2

: the earth with its inhabitants and all things upon it

3

: individual course of life : career

4

: the inhabitants of the earth : the human race

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/world

 

And I left all the following definitions which only confirm the above ones.

The "world" is always and ENTIRETY, a WHOLE. A part of the world is NOT the world. When Jesus said that he came to save the WORLD he meant the WORLD, not few parts of it.

Therefore if sometime a dead walking man in a death row is pardoned and is not executed, the governor didn't save the WORLD (aka the WHOLE community) of dead walking men in his state prison, the governor saved just one, or few,  A PART OF THE WHOLE community (the "world of dead walking men").

The Calvi-dishonests know well that "world" and "whole" can be synonimous.

If that governor would say that he saved the WHOLE community (or the "world") of dead walking men in the state prison, because he saved only ONE (or just only few of them), that governor should be at least impeached because affected by a serious mental disturbance and unable to carry on his duty as representative of the  people's will.

(We could suggest him to become a .... Calvinist preacher specialized in .....predestinationism 🤣)

Calvinist and predestinationist dishonest guys are exactly brainwashing you in to believe that God is an idiot jerk like that governor, becase "nothing is impossible with God" and "the foolishness of God is above the wisdom of man" blah blah blah. 

Therefore any idiocy and psychosis of a Predestinationist Mind can be attributed to God thanks those verses.

Isn't smart the Devil, making you blaspheme God while you believe to praise Him ? But just for this purpose the Devil created - among many of his wonders - Calvinism with its predestinationist spiritual syphilis.

The weight of the proof is on them, as they claim that these words must be used the same way throughout Scripture. Evidently, they are not. They are used differently in different contexts and, in fact, the absolute meaning is VERY rarely used. There are a whole lot of these non absolute verses. I have only presented two.

"There are a WHOLE lot of these non absolute verses. I have only presented two." 😂😂😂 

 

And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

Evidently the Eskimos, the Indians, the Japanese and many others, together with the rejectors, as well as all people who died without hearing these tidings, are EXCLUDED.

Therefore God predestinated some to be saved the most to be damned just only because He isn't able to bring the Gospel to the Inuit in the age of emperor Nero ? But God is not unfair like the Calvinist God, he provided EVERYONE a means of salvation and he shut the mouth of the predestinationist with:

12For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;

13(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.

14For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:

15Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

16In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.

 

This is for all the people who never heard the Gospel. Do you think God is so stupid just in order to fit the Calvinist nut-dreams ?

"EXCLUDED": And then, why not ?  Isn't God a predestinationist ? [by hypothesis] .... If He has decided the majority of the world population is lost without hope, why to send to them the Gospel ?  

See  now the demency of this argument ?  

Or contrary - wise: why need of the Gospel if they are already saved ? 

But no one can deliver the Gospel to infant babies or foetuses. The tidings must go to adult or well aware people, in order they can hear and chose. "No! .... they have already been chosen!".... Why then they need of the Gospel ?  ..... Babies, and unborn babies ?  They don't need of the Gospel. WHY SHOULD AN ADULT OR GROWN SOUL HEAR THE GOSPEL ?

14How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

If God saves unborn babies without delivering them the Gospel, why the adults are not saved without the Gospel ? Isn't nothing impossible with God?

Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of all men:

According to the free willers, the Eskimos, the Indians, the Japanese and many others were spectators of Paul's ministry. But it is evidently false.

Now, the husband of Mrs Dishonesty is Mr Calvinism. The men here all the ones interacting with the Corinth's church because this is the CONTEXT. But which is the context of  1 Peter 3:9 ?

9The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

They are called GENERAL epistles for a reason, aren't they ? 

Is that "all" referring to "us-ward" ? Don't tell me that the  brethren of Peter were still needing to be .....saved. In this case they were NOT brethren, but still gentile, lost souls.

Therefore "Us-Ward" is referring to the generality of lost souls needing to be saved. Peter and his bunch DIDN'T need to be saved. Here Pete & C. simply impersonate the generality of the whole lost mankind, putting themselves in it with a mental time travel when they were still unsaved lost souls. They lower themselves to the same plane of lost souls. This is called HUMILITY,  an unknown word in the Predestinationist's dictionary.

Then there's that "longsuffering". Even more idiotic the predestinationist interpretation. God is NOT longsuffering towards the ones he has already condemned or saved. Longsuffering or "to suffer for a long time", therefore there's a moment when the suffering will cease. But if one is already saved before to be created, there's no need for God to suffer. But if there's a free will independent from God's, there God needs longsuffering. 

If with God nothing is impossible, is the same God who eternally and infallibly decreed that man has independent free-will.

MORE TO COME ON THE IDIOCY OF CALVI-NUTTISM.

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Calvinuts 6 - Predestinationism is the Devil fight against rationality

https://spirithismouth.blogspot.com/2025/06/calvinuts-6-predestinationism-is-devil.html