>
Some verses to debunk the One World Religion movement of the Devil, seeking to unite all the religions of the world in a single poly-religious monster (based in Rome):
Isaiah 5:20
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Has been Christ Jesus crucified in order to give the light to the Buddhists - for example - or to welcome the darkness of their knowledge in the light of the Father? Therefore, why to "put darkness for light" ??
Romans 3:4
“God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.”
If all the religions of the world are true, is God a liar???
I noticed this feature in the right wing movements of today, which are supporting the sovereignity of the nation/people, a new nationalism namely. They are supporters of the s.c. "voice of the people" and are against any form of compromise and intermediation between the people's will and the centers of political decision and power. A classical example is the Italian Northern League party of Matteo Salvini which is fighting to bring the Italian's people's voice in Brussels defending it against any work of compromise by the "EU bureucrats".
But at the same time, such parties are against the spiritual sovereignity of the people: they are in love with a religion which created thousands of spiritual bureaucratic intermediaries between man and God: saints, Madonna, priests. A religion which is a spiritual bureucratic monster, requiring rosary's prayers, penances, confessions, eating cakes, candles, pilgrimages, etc. in order to the petition in the right place in the heavenly "Brussels".
Hypocrisy? Or rather a lucid design? Deviating the attention away from the religions which are false, to focus on the problems of this world?
Good works are at the core of the One World Religion. They cannot be performed without to hate the Bible. Every man is a concentrate of 99% of evilness and 1% of true good works. Being evil man naturally focuses on that 1% of sincere god hearted activity ("...when I saw that poor man I gave him some Euros from the bottom of my heart!!"). This one percent of good things of man is transformed - by a lie, as the constituent of the 99% of his nature, and his evilness is claimed, at the opposite, to be the 1% of his nature. Man's goodness is like a tiny atoll in the middle of a Pacific Ocean of evilness: to show that "I am good", the lost soul tries to shovel the sand from one end of the atoll to the opposite end, in order to enlarge the beach of his godness and to pretend that "I am able to conquer the evilness of my heart with my hands/will!"....
Or man is like a glass of pure milk, just one drop of coffe, and it is no more pure, even if from far away it seems still having a pure white color. Man tries to pour again the milk of his good works in his life in order to dilute that drop of black coffee.... to no avail. The new milk pours over the edge on the top, leaving untouched the 99.99% of the polluted milk below.... You cannot pretend that God drinks your polluted coffee...
especially if the new milk added is already polluted by your selfish desire to avoid Hell.... Being a lost soul you DESERVE Hell, and you should agree with God that you DESERVE Hell. But you don't agree with God and this is the reason why you do your "gooood works!", in order what you righteously deserve. This is the drop of coffee in every bit of new milk you add to your lost black soul. You cannot save yourself, can you??
This is the contradiction of the good works, which the Bible (AV 1611) warns against. The only 'good work' able to save you, is a sort of negative 'good work', the ascertainment that you cannot be saved if not by and through the grace of another person, more powerful than any human. That between what you are and what you ought to be is divided by an abyss that is not only impossible to overcome by man, but even to understand fully. God gave several words in order to catch that, in a glimpse, for example:
Jeremiah 13:23
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
King James Version (KJV)
This is why we are HATED by the pope, and "his holiness" declared war to us:
https://apnews.com › general-news-f26ebc2794164dd4879701e0a13d0596
Pope: Fundamentalist terrorism result of 'deviant religion'
VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Francis on Monday denounced the religious fundamentalism that inspired the Paris massacres and ongoing Mideast conflicts, saying the attackers were enslaved by "deviant forms of religion" that used God as a mere ideological pretext to perpetuate mass killings.
https://www.americamagazine.org › faith › 2019 › 11 › 19 › pope-francis-religious-fundamentalism-plague
Pope Francis: Religious fundamentalism is a 'plague' - America Magazine
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Interreligious dialogue is an important way to counter fundamentalist groups as well as the unjust accusation that religions sow division, Pope Francis said. Meeting with...
https://www.ncronline.org › vatican › francis-comic-strip › francis-chronicles › religious-fundamentalism-plague-pope-says
Religious fundamentalism is a 'plague,' pope says
Vatican City — November 18, 2019. Interreligious dialogue is an important way to counter fundamentalist groups as well as the unjust accusation that religions sow division, Pope Francis said.
https://www.catholicworldreport.com › 2021 › 10 › 07 › pope-francis-all-religious-traditions-must-resist-temptation-to-fundamentalism
Pope Francis: All religious traditions must resist 'temptation to ...
Pope Francis asked leaders of world religions to resist "the temptation to fundamentalism" for the sake of peace at an interreligious gathering Thursday in front of the Colosseum.
https://www.franciscanmedia.org › news-commentary › pope-religions-must-be-purified-of-extremism-self-righteousness
Pope: Religions must be purified of extremism, self-righteousness
15 set 2022In his formal talk to the congress, Pope Francis said that "authentic religiosity" is needed to fight fundamentalism and extremism in religion and to show the world that it has no reason to distrust or have "contempt for religion as if it were a destabilizing force in modern society."
https://international.la-croix.com › news › religion › religious-fundamentalism-is-a-plague-pope-says › 11294
Religious fundamentalism is a plague, pope says
2 giorni faThe Thirty Years' War began in 1618 as a conflict between Catholic and Protestant states, and the massacre of 1572 saw the targeted assassination of the Huguenots by Catholic mobs in France, the...
Technically, fundamentalists put the doctrine above the word. This is an error, because without word doctrine is changeable. Fundamentalists (in the Christian field) believe that the original inspired manuscripts are vanished forever and God didn't retain inspiration in the copies (again, this is debunked by the Bible AV 1611, see 2 Timothy 3:15-16, Psalm 138:2, 12:6-7, etc.).
But we can accept the term "fundamentalist" in a positive way also: we are the ones who DON'T sacrifice the doctrine in order to get man's approval.
Now I kow why the pope uses this wrong term referred to Christian: that guy doesn't want to use the right term, because he is afraid of it. We are BIBLE-BELIEVER (and I add: AV 1611 believer), rather than fundamentalists. The pope is scared by the term "Bible-believer" because the term is connected with a book his ancestors have already cursed as a "serpent". He prefers to use the word "fundamentalist" because he doesn't want to hear the word "Bible", even in a negative context.
